Reklam

English Content

 

Warning: mkdir() [function.mkdir]: Permission denied in /home/haytap/public_html/modules/mod_janews/helper.php on line 108

(*)Animal groups win victory in pit bull ban row

(*)Animal groups win victory in pit bull ban row

Last week was filled with panic, anxiety and grief for many pit bull owners in Turkey as three ministries announced that they had introduced breed-specific legislation, under which all pit bull breed dogs in the country would be “collected” by municipalities, without specifying what would happen to the dogs afterwards.


“She is no different to me than my daughter, I’ve had her for six years,” said Gökhan Sertel, a 42-year-old businessman from İstanbul’s Küçükçekmece district, speaking on the day the ban was first announced. “There is no way I am giving her to anybody,” he said determinedly. However, not all pit bull owners are created equal, developments soon proved. As animal rights groups, activists, veterinarians and public health experts repeatedly made statements slamming the law for violating animal and even human rights, some owners simply let their dogs loose fearing they might get in trouble or have to face the TL 3,434 fine. After all, it is a fact that a particular kind of person is attracted to pit bulls. In less than 48 hours, bewildered pit bulls, dumped by their owners, started roaming the streets of Turkey’s largest cities. One newspaper claimed that a family in İzmir was attacked by one such stray pit bull, although members of the family did not appear to have any visible bite marks or injuries in the pictures. Photographs published in the press showed the family’s young son pointing to a blemish on his face, that looked more like an acne spot than a bite mark from a massive and ferocious jaw, but the story was popular, adding to the pit bull hype.

Perhaps it was the threat of mafia bosses, thugs, dogfight fans and in general the kind of people you wouldn’t want to mess with letting their dogs loose on an entire society that helped reverse the ban, but animal rights groups trying to talk some sense into the authorities and hundreds of thousands of people backing animal rights’ groups petitions also seems to have played a role in the reversal. Minister of Environment and Forestry Veysel Eroğlu on Thursday said a circular sent to local authorities had been cancelled and that “we are not going to take anybody’s dog.”

Problems with breed-specific legislation

Experts have pointed out many problems with this kind of legislation, but the fact that it simply does not work is probably the greatest defect. In addition to this, such bans infringe on personal freedoms. According to Professor Tamer Dodurka, head of the İstanbul University veterinary faculty of internal medicine, breed-specific legislation is also a violation of human rights. “What you should do is not ban a particular breed. This is not scientific. The entire world rejects this,” he said. He also noted that past examples in other countries showed that wherever pit bulls were banned, the number of pit bulls in that country rose rapidly. “We always tell people, when you see a dog you think is dangerous, don’t look at the dog’s breed, look at what the owner looks like. If the owner is dangerous, run away,” he added.

Lawyer Ahmet Kemal Şenpolat, head of the Animal Rights Federation (HAYTAP), pointed out other shortcomings of the pit bull ban and problems with breed-specific legislation in general, saying: “The problem here is not the pit bull itself. The problem is that there is no obstacle in the way of uncontrolled breeding and the sale of this breed. The problem is that by banning these animals you are creating the perception in the eyes of society that they are a brand of ‘fighting dogs.’ We had a similar law come out in 2004, and the popularity of dogfights across the country grew following that.”

Like many other experts, Şenpolat also said that it is not the pit bull, but the owners who give them a bad name who are to blame for pit-bull-related attacks. “Dog fighting websites get 10 times more clicks than our website, HAYTAP. There is incredible demand for this online. We as an organization keep appealing to prosecutors to shut these sites down, but the telecommunications law does not allow closing websites with animal fights.”

What to do about dog attacks?

Şenpolat said based on these realities, it was pretty clear what needed to be done. “We would expect the Ministry of Environment and Forestry to make an effort to take the law on animal cruelty from under the misdemeanor code and put it within the scope of the criminal code,” he said.

HAYTAP and other organizations also indicated further shortcomings in the withdrawn regulation, such as the lack of infrastructure and personnel in Turkey to take care of the animals, even if the authorities did manage to collect them all. “We are against them [pit bulls] being raised in urban areas. But these animals will always be illegally bred and used in fights. You see it a lot, they poison stray animals and more strays come back after a while,” Şenpolat added.

The correct method is to keep track of every single animal, which was what the law said specifically of pit bulls and a few other “power breeds” in 2004, but it was not enforced. In fact, as Şenpolat notes, pit bull ownership became much more widespread in Turkey, and pit bulls much more readily available.

A celebrity victim of a pit bull attack, TV host Öykü Serter, whose attack made news headlines in 2007, also says she doesn’t have anything against the breed. “The real problem is with dog owners. They use these dogs for all the wrong purposes. They are messing with the psychology of those animals and torture them,” she said.

A comprehensive study by the United States Centers for Disease Control (CDC) notes that many other factors besides breed, such as heredity, sex, early experience, reproductive status, socialization and training, might affect aggressive behavior in dogs. No similar study exists in Turkey, but according to CDC findings more than 70 percent of all dog bite cases involve unneutered male dogs. An unneutered male dog is 2.6 times more likely to bite than a neutered dog. A chained or tethered dog is 2.8 times more likely to bite than a dog that is not chained or tethered. Ninety-seven percent of dogs involved in fatal dog attacks in 2006 were not spayed/neutered. Seventy-eight percent were kept not as pets, but rather for guarding, image enhancement, fighting or breeding. Eighty-four percent were maintained by reckless owners -- these dogs were abused or neglected, not humanely treated and kept or allowed to interact with children unsupervised.

The figures make clear the correct approach to minimizing dog attacks on humans. As Viktor Larkhill from animal rights group Let’s Adopt! said: “The only way to protect people from vicious dogs is to go after the dogs that are actually dangerous. Dangerous dog laws focus on any dog, of any breed, that has a history of aggression, and on the people who deliberately train and/or use dogs to act aggressively or for criminal activity. It’s time that we stop blaming the wrong dogs and start addressing the real problem: bad owners.”

04 July 2010, Sunday

E. BARIŞ ALTINTAŞ İSTANBUL

http://www.todayszaman.com/tz-web/detaylar.do?load=detay&link=215056

 


“She is no different to me than my daughter, I’ve had her for six years,” said Gökhan Sertel, a 42-year-old businessman from İstanbul’s Küçükçekmece district, speaking on the day the ban was first announced. “There is no way I am giving her to anybody,” he said determinedly. However, not all pit bull owners are created equal, developments soon proved. As animal rights groups, activists, veterinarians and public health experts repeatedly made statements slamming the law for violating animal and even human rights, some owners simply let their dogs loose fearing they might get in trouble or have to face the TL 3,434 fine. After all, it is a fact that a particular kind of person is attracted to pit bulls. In less than 48 hours, bewildered pit bulls, dumped by their owners, started roaming the streets of Turkey’s largest cities. One newspaper claimed that a family in İzmir was attacked by one such stray pit bull, although members of the family did not appear to have any visible bite marks or injuries in the pictures. Photographs published in the press showed the family’s young son pointing to a blemish on his face, that looked more like an acne spot than a bite mark from a massive and ferocious jaw, but the story was popular, adding to the pit bull hype.

Perhaps it was the threat of mafia bosses, thugs, dogfight fans and in general the kind of people you wouldn’t want to mess with letting their dogs loose on an entire society that helped reverse the ban, but animal rights groups trying to talk some sense into the authorities and hundreds of thousands of people backing animal rights’ groups petitions also seems to have played a role in the reversal. Minister of Environment and Forestry Veysel Eroğlu on Thursday said a circular sent to local authorities had been cancelled and that “we are not going to take anybody’s dog.”

Problems with breed-specific legislation

Experts have pointed out many problems with this kind of legislation, but the fact that it simply does not work is probably the greatest defect. In addition to this, such bans infringe on personal freedoms. According to Professor Tamer Dodurka, head of the İstanbul University veterinary faculty of internal medicine, breed-specific legislation is also a violation of human rights. “What you should do is not ban a particular breed. This is not scientific. The entire world rejects this,” he said. He also noted that past examples in other countries showed that wherever pit bulls were banned, the number of pit bulls in that country rose rapidly. “We always tell people, when you see a dog you think is dangerous, don’t look at the dog’s breed, look at what the owner looks like. If the owner is dangerous, run away,” he added.

Lawyer Ahmet Kemal Şenpolat, head of the Animal Rights Federation (HAYTAP), pointed out other shortcomings of the pit bull ban and problems with breed-specific legislation in general, saying: “The problem here is not the pit bull itself. The problem is that there is no obstacle in the way of uncontrolled breeding and the sale of this breed. The problem is that by banning these animals you are creating the perception in the eyes of society that they are a brand of ‘fighting dogs.’ We had a similar law come out in 2004, and the popularity of dogfights across the country grew following that.”

Like many other experts, Şenpolat also said that it is not the pit bull, but the owners who give them a bad name who are to blame for pit-bull-related attacks. “Dog fighting websites get 10 times more clicks than our website, HAYTAP. There is incredible demand for this online. We as an organization keep appealing to prosecutors to shut these sites down, but the telecommunications law does not allow closing websites with animal fights.”

What to do about dog attacks?

Şenpolat said based on these realities, it was pretty clear what needed to be done. “We would expect the Ministry of Environment and Forestry to make an effort to take the law on animal cruelty from under the misdemeanor code and put it within the scope of the criminal code,” he said.

HAYTAP and other organizations also indicated further shortcomings in the withdrawn regulation, such as the lack of infrastructure and personnel in Turkey to take care of the animals, even if the authorities did manage to collect them all. “We are against them [pit bulls] being raised in urban areas. But these animals will always be illegally bred and used in fights. You see it a lot, they poison stray animals and more strays come back after a while,” Şenpolat added.

The correct method is to keep track of every single animal, which was what the law said specifically of pit bulls and a few other “power breeds” in 2004, but it was not enforced. In fact, as Şenpolat notes, pit bull ownership became much more widespread in Turkey, and pit bulls much more readily available.

A celebrity victim of a pit bull attack, TV host Öykü Serter, whose attack made news headlines in 2007, also says she doesn’t have anything against the breed. “The real problem is with dog owners. They use these dogs for all the wrong purposes. They are messing with the psychology of those animals and torture them,” she said.

A comprehensive study by the United States Centers for Disease Control (CDC) notes that many other factors besides breed, such as heredity, sex, early experience, reproductive status, socialization and training, might affect aggressive behavior in dogs. No similar study exists in Turkey, but according to CDC findings more than 70 percent of all dog bite cases involve unneutered male dogs. An unneutered male dog is 2.6 times more likely to bite than a neutered dog. A chained or tethered dog is 2.8 times more likely to bite than a dog that is not chained or tethered. Ninety-seven percent of dogs involved in fatal dog attacks in 2006 were not spayed/neutered. Seventy-eight percent were kept not as pets, but rather for guarding, image enhancement, fighting or breeding. Eighty-four percent were maintained by reckless owners -- these dogs were abused or neglected, not humanely treated and kept or allowed to interact with children unsupervised.

The figures make clear the correct approach to minimizing dog attacks on humans. As Viktor Larkhill from animal rights group Let’s Adopt! said: “The only way to protect people from vicious dogs is to go after the dogs that are actually dangerous. Dangerous dog laws focus on any dog, of any breed, that has a history of aggression, and on the people who deliberately train and/or use dogs to act aggressively or for criminal activity. It’s time that we stop blaming the wrong dogs and start addressing the real problem: bad owners.”


04 July 2010, Sunday

E. BARIŞ ALTINTAŞ İSTANBUL
Comments on this article

selwyn marock , Jul 04 2010 09:44, Sunday



a well written and factual article.BSL belongs to Adolph Hitler and should be buried with him. Address Dog-Fighting and...



The most read articles of this category

Turkey tells Israel to apologize or to agree to an int'l probe
All eyes on Constitutional Court as it rules on crucial reform package
Spanish MEP del Valle: We are learning from Turkey
Organizers deny J. Lo cancelled plans to visit KKTC
Constitutional Court annulling reform package would ruin economy
British conservatives assail Hague over Turkey’s EU membership remarks
Exonerating those who drew the borders is harder than changing the borders
Politicians take ‘squatting’ row to a new low
Sledgehammer indictment mentions 270 suspects
Clinton seeks to ease Nagorno-Karabakh tensions with Baku


The most read articles

Turkey tells Israel to apologize or to agree to an int'l probe
All eyes on Constitutional Court as it rules on crucial reform package
Spanish MEP del Valle: We are learning from Turkey
‘Turkey’s entry into EU will present model against clash of cultures’
Organizers deny J. Lo cancelled plans to visit KKTC
Constitutional Court annulling reform package would ruin economy
British conservatives assail Hague over Turkey’s EU membership remarks
Exonerating those who drew the borders is harder than changing the borders
Politicians take ‘squatting’ row to a new low
Sledgehammer indictment mentions 270 suspects

 

Warning: imagejpeg() [function.imagejpeg]: Unable to open '/home/haytap/public_html/images/resized/images/stories/galeriler/ilginc/sevgiengeltanimaz_500_439.jpg' for writing: Permission denied in /home/haytap/public_html/modules/mod_janews/helper.php on line 127

I Clicked, I Clacked, And Thus I Protected Animal Rights!

I Clicked, I Clacked, And Thus I Protected Animal Rights!

 

Unfortunately, hundreds of thousands of animals on the world are slaughtered every day by humans, mostly through heaviest suffering. Since they are treated as "lesser souls" and they do not have media through which they can publish their anguish nor they have activists to protect their rights, less than 1/1000 of their suffering can get through to us.

 

Since animal rights activists are mostly disorganized and uncoordinated, such violations cannot be properly made into laws that prevent them happening again.

 

Most of the "animal lovers" who are aware of the situation just let their anguish out through cursing, damning or plainly swearing, thus simply choose to EXPRESS THEIR DESPERATION.

 

As we always said, disorganized and uncoordinated, day-by-day efforts serve to only drain peoples' energy and cause all the long-term struggle to go to waste just by a momentary decision of "street-smart" human species.

 

 

 

One of such short-term efforts that recently became widespread are the "virtual petition" campaigns, which meant protesting through Internet. For instance, if someone killed whales in Japan, just slap together a virtual petition which includes clicking on "YES" button and entering some text to convey the message.

 

Or if some dogs are slaughtered in Ankara, create another virtual petition site on the Internet, announce the site, have everyone click and clack on the appropriate spots so that this slaughter be protested as well and let everyone clear their conscience with a feeling of having their duty performed.

 

Honestly, how logical does it sound to you? Which slaughterer gets so impressed by a web site that he or she says "Wow, 70,000 clicks protesting what I did; I better stop doing it"?

 

Worse, such "Click and Clack" petitioning causes animal lovers to switch to a state of complacency by giving them a false sense of relief of having a duty done, which I personally failed to grasp so far.

 

The only valid communication method with the state is the physical and written means. In order to create a pressure one has to get an appointment for a face-to-face meeting, express the trouble and wishes in writing consciously, clearly, scientifically and if possible by referring to laws and regulations, and then negotiate.

 

 

 

A virtual environment that only you and your peers know is most likely a place where you browse when you're in the office. That is, that world virtually exists but has nothing to do with the reality. Actually, if these virtual petitions on the Internet were of any use, most problems including human rights, environmental rights, women's rights could have been resolved by now. For this reason, people who are physically involved with animals in shelters or in the streets do not understand this "Internet world" and rightfully show a strong reaction against it.

 

If we cannot reach the higher positions of the state or those of the organizations for which slaughterers work through public relations, lobbying, applying pressure on political parties or universities, education, panels, seminars, picketing, TV programs and brochures, which is a much harder way, or we prefer not to use these means because it's much harder, then believe you me that by this clicking and clacking and virtual petitioning we will only be doing PROPAGANDA among ourselves and nothing more.

 

In short, we will be proving the Turkish proverb "The hare was mad at the mountain but the mountain was unaware of it" with each click, thousands of times.

 

[Translator's note: I personally believe that the popularity of "virtual petitioning" in Turkey has a lot to do with the attitude of "somebody do something but I can't be bothered more than this", which showed tremendous increase in recent years.]

 

 

Of course, hundreds of alternative means to create pressure on aforementioned organizations and vicious people can be exemplified. However, unless these have been performed in a systematic and organized manner, hundreds of thousands of animals will continue to suffer.

 

Do you think minimizing seal slaughtering in Canada has been accomplished through clicking and clacking? Canadian government down to its individual representatives and ministers has been pressurized by organizations and national assemblies throughout the world sending a hail of official protests; hence the partial improvement. Even Canadian citizens were rallied by environmental organizations against their government to stop this senseless savagery.

 

Spain may put a ban on bullfighting not because of virtual petitioning. Because of official letters of protest and fear of reduced tourism revenues through boycotting, it is on the verge of stepping back.

 

If it had been this easy, fight for rights, which is a rather new event in the world history could have been resolved fast. Internet can only be effective only when a serious and respectable news site keeps posting articles on this issue continuously, and only to a certain degree. There are hundreds of thousands of people who are not part of that world since they do not simply turn on the monitor.

 

In summary, unless you are a day-by-day activist and you can take more realistic steps to realize your ideas, "you're in for it till the end".

 

Otherwise, you continue to be one of the hundreds of thousands of people who keep worrying, suffering and spreading unhappiness around yet folding their arms and doing nothing to pay what we owe to our animal friends.

 

Don't you agree?

 

Ahmet Kemal Şenpolat, Attorney At Law

President of Animal Rights Federation HAYTAP

 

 Bu metni türkçe olarak okumak istiyorsanız lütfen buraya tıklayın.

Son Güncelleme ( Pazar, 17 Ocak 2010 22:59 )


Warning: imagejpeg() [function.imagejpeg]: Unable to open '/home/haytap/public_html/images/resized/images/stories/galeriler/ilginc2/haytap2g0018_500_704.jpg' for writing: Permission denied in /home/haytap/public_html/modules/mod_janews/helper.php on line 127

What did HAYTAP do in 2008?

What did HAYTAP do in 2008?

                       What did HAYTAP do in 2008? 


The most important success of HAYTAP in 2008 was bringing together the animal rights defenders and animal rights associations. HAYTAP  is the first association, which succeed this event in Turkey. The workings started in 2007 and announced to all of the members  at the HAYTAP’s HOUSE in 2008. Being together was only a dream till HAYTAP made it real. The animal rights associations, which are in Istanbul, Diyarbakır, Antalya, Adana and Giresun  founded this association then HAYTAP got the legal personality and became a federation.

In a short while after being a federation, the animal rights associations of Çanakkale, Kocaeli and Eskişehir joined to HAYTAP, so the number of the member associations reached 8 and the number of the legal members reached 47 while approaching to the end of the 2008. The biggest success of HAYTAP in 2008 was bringing together the people, who defend the same aim, for announceing the voice of the federation to the government. The joining signals of the new and conscious members, who have the same aim and the team spirit appeared from Bitlis to Marmaris in these months

2- The main team of HAYTAP met each other, the duty dispersions were done, the principles of the association were told to the new members at the meetings in İstanbul in May and July, which continued a few weeks. The people, who were belived that they can not work together with the association in international area, decided to work in local area.

 

3- While the meeetings in İstanbul, there was a big disaster in Antalya. It was the biggest massacre of the animals in Turkey. Our volunteers found dead animal bodies, who were murdered brutal in Varnak forest in Antalya. HAYTAP step in that event and arranged a big protestation. The volunteers condemn that with dibbling olive plant in forests in all over the Turkey on 14th June 2008 at 2pm.

 

4- A stall (stand) of HAYTAP was set at an opening in Gebze and there was a short conversation with the enviroment minister Veysel Eroğlu about the massacre in Antalya and the wish of the changing of the law.

 

5- In Ankara, meetings were arrenged for the national organization and acting together for two days in July, it was the continuation of the meetings in İstanbul. The people were elected, with who we can work together with the team spirit in Anatolian and Ankara. The animal rights, regulations, judicial situtation, the missings of the law, experiences were told to the participants. The members from Anatolian, who didn’t know each other, met.

 

6- For the first time in Turkey, there was a panel, which arranged by the organization which authorizes lawyers and oversees the law profession and HAYTAP team and it continued for 7 hours. The aim of the panel was showing everybody, that the animal rights are defended by legal ways. The book ‘The Approach To The Animal Rights’ was published by the helping of the organization which authorizes lawyers and oversees the law profession, which contains the voice recordings of the panel. This book contained the decisions of the court of cassation, legal visuals of the lawyers about the animal rights and this was the first time in Turkey. There are many people, who were interested in this book and it sent to the members of the court of cassation, media companions, the members of TBMM and too the ministers.

  

7- There were conversations with the local executives in Anamur, Düzce, Diyarbakır, İstanbul and put it on the billboards. By the way, for introducing the association,  persuading the  people to be more sensetive and making a team-work, brochures and posters were started to publish.

  

8- A lot of letter of applications sent to the managerial places, there were many conversations with the municipality chairmans and etc. Especially the Aegean Coordinator Funda Ersoy went to the bad situationed shelters, they succeeded many workings with the help of the  municipalities such as Burhaniye, Fethiye, Ayvalık, küçükköy, Altınova, Kuşadası etc.

 

9- The film ‘KÖPEKLER ADASI’ (the island of the dogs) played at beyoglu cinema which directed by the skilled film director Halit Refiğ. Halit refiğ, actors and actress helped to playing this film at the cinema. HAYTAP gave plate to Halit Refiğ for his helpings.


10- HAYTAP was invited to the enviromental platform which placed in Antalya (AKÇEP) as a speaker and the problem of the animal rights in Turkey, its solutions, the reosons of the changing of the law, and present situation were discussed. The participants, who camed from different cities, esteemed the success of HAYTAP. The infraction of the animal rights and the workings, which are necessary to do, were published in the consequence manifesto of this platform.


11-    There are Saturday meetings in the HAYTAP’s HOUSE. The new members are informed at that meetings ande the duty dispersions are made for them such as planning team, petshop team, zoo team, test team etc. New teams can be organized for new members. Animal rights are more than stroking a cats or dogs head and the workings of the volunteers are more effective with team work and education. These are important points which are underlined in the meetings. So we get a lot of new friends and can produce more effective things.


12- HAYTAP, the animal rights committee,which is belonging to the organization which authorizes lawyers and oversees the law profession in Istanbul and the veterinary committee worked together to prapare a new law project for years. After all, the law project was reported to the parliamentary by some of the parliamentarians, who belong to AKP and CHP. It is stil argueing in the parliamentary. All of these situations were written on the newspapers such as Milliyet,Radikal and Fanatik.


13- The municipality of İstanbul tips ruble on a lake basin in Büyükçekmece and because of this reason, the lake basin can get dry and the wild animals, who live there and also the immigrant birds can die. Our federation sued them for stopping it. The lawsuit stil continues. 


14- In August, our volunteers were not allowed to enter inside the shelter, which is belonging to the Zeytinburnu municipality. And the condition of the animals in this shelter was very bad. That’s why there was made a determination to this shelter  by the magistrates' cort of Bakırköy. On the expert report it was written that this shelter is out of order and dosen’t have enough quality or speciality to be a good and skilled shelter and because of this reasons it should be closed. Then the municipality sued our representative people for 10 million turkish liras. It was a law of torts and it still continues.


15- Most of our volunteers go to the shelters, anywhere they can reach, for checking the conditions of them and if possible helping them. The most dramatically conditioned shelter was the shelter, which is placed in Güngören,İstanbul. It was ownerless and poor. The pictures of that place and the writings sent to the CNN Turk television and they made lots of broadcastings and interviews about it during 5 days. In this way, our volunteers showed everybody what it happens, what they experienced and saw happens in this shelters. There was a big and important event

16- The most important event of the year was the documentary film about the animals in İstanbul, which live on the streets. We made this film with the helpings of the IZ TV channel. The film is still running on the 88th channel in Digiturk till 2010. The displayings and conversations are so clear that anybody can realize it is a very good job, which is made by the fair people. So it was a big and succeed production.


17- By the way, the news about being institutional for animal rights and about the continued existance, which should be organized and legal published in newspapers,on the websites and TV’s. The Newsweek and the other mass media published our legal visions. We made and publish our posters. The member associations had also lots of workings such as concerts and arrenging stall (stand) organizations.







HAYTAP 2008 yılında neler yaptı ?


HAYTAP’ın 2008 yılı içindeki en önemli başarısı , yıllardır bir araya gelemeyen bir çok hayvan hakları savunucularını ve derneği  Türkiye’de ilk defa güçlü bir ses altında toplamayı başarması oldu. 2007 yılında başlayan çalışmalar 9 Temmuz 2008 tarihinde , HAYTAP EVİNDE tüm üyelere duyuruldu. Herkesin uzun yıllardır dile getirdiği birlik olalım temennileri bir rüya olarak gerçekleşti. Istanbul , Diyarbakır , Antalya , Adana ve Giresun illerindeki hayvan haklarını savunan duyarlı derneklerin kurucu dernek olduğu bu oluşumda kurulan birliktelik ile resmi tüzel kişilik kazanılarak FEDERASYON olundu.

Federasyon olmanın hemen akabindeki çok kısa sürede , 2008 yılının sonuna yaklaşıldığında , federasyon bünyesine Çanakkale , Kocaeli ve Eskişehir ‘den de katılımlar olmasıyla üye dernek sayısı 8 e , resmi temsilci sayısı 47e çıktı. Devlet makamlarına ancak örgütlü ve kurumsal bir çalışma ile seslerini daha iyi duyurabileceğine inanan , devlet makamlarını dağınık olarak değil ancak birlikte ve dayanışma hali içinde olan , aynı davaya inanmış bir çok kişinin bir araya gelmesi ile bu birlikteliğin oluşması , sanırız 2008 yılında HAYTAP ın Türkiye’deki en büyük başarısı idi. Önümüzdeki aylarda aynı uğruda mücadele eden , bilinçli , bilimsel ve takım ruhuna sahip çok daha fazla gerçek ve tüzel kişinin bu çatı altında toplanacağının da sinyalleri Bitlis’ten Marmaris’e kadar gelmeye başladı.

 

2- Mayıs ve Temmuz aylarında haftalarca süren Istanbul toplantıları ile HAYTAP’ın bel kemiğini oluşturan ekipler ile birebir tanışmalar sağlandı , görev dağılımları yapılmaya başlandı ve yeni arkadaşlarla bizlerin prensipleri ile yola devam edecek arkadaşların durumunun tesbitinde bu günler süren Istanbul toplantılarının çok büyük faydası oldu. Beraber çalışamayacağına inandığımız , ulusal çapta bir takım ruhu içinde hareket edemeyeceğini belirten arkadaşlarımız maalesef bizlerden ayrılarak , yerel bazda çalışmalara devam etme kararı aldılar.

 
3- Istanbul bahar toplantılarının yapıldığı zamanlarda büyük bir talihsizlik yaşandı ve Antalya’da Türkiye’nin bugüne kadar yaşadığı en büyük hayvan katliamlarından birisine tanık olunurken , Antalya Varsak ormanlarında gönüllülerimiz bir çok öldürülmüş hayvan cesedi ile karşılaştı. HAYTAP , yine bu olaya müdahele edip kısa zamanda en etkin biçimde protesto gösterisi düzenledi.  14 Haziran 2008 tarihinde saat 14te tüm Türkiye’de eş zamanlı olarak hem bu olayı kınadı hem de orada ölen hayvanlar adına bulundukları illerde tüm arkadaşlarımız yakınlarındaki  ormanlara zeytin fidanı diktiler.

 

4- Gebze’de düzenlenen bir açılışta HAYTAP olarak stand kuruldu ve Çevre Bakanı sayın Veysel Eroğlu ile kısa da olsa görüşme sağlanarak Antalya’da yaşanan bu katliam ve yasa değişikliği istemimiz tekrar gündeme getirildi.

 

5- Temmuz ayında Istanbul toplantılarının devamı olarak Ankara’da da ulusal örgütlenme ve birlikte hareket edebilmek adına iki gün süreli Ankara toplantıları yapıldı , Anadolu’da ve Ankara’da kendileri ile takım ruhu içinde çalışabileceğimiz arkadaşlar belirlendi , katılımcılara hayvan hakları , mevzuat , hukuki durum , yasanın eksiklikleri , başarılan illerdeki tecrübeler konusunda bilgi paylaşımı sağlandı , birbirini tanımayan bir çok Anadolu ilindeki temsilci ve derneğimiz fiili olarak tanışma olanağı sağlamış oldu.

 

6- Istanbul Barosu hayvan hakları komisyonu ile hayvan hakları konusunda o dönem platform olan ekibimiz Türkiye’de ilk defa hayvan haklarının hukuki anlamda da savunulduğunu göstermek üzere baro çatısı altında yaklaşık 7 saat süren bir panel düzenledi. Bu panelin tüm ses kayıtlarını da içeren kitap İstanbul barosunun da katkıları ile yayınlandı. Hayvan Haklarına hukuki yaklaşım adlı bu kitap da Türkiye’de hayvan haklarının ilk defa bir kitap içinde Yargıtay kararlarından , hukuki görüşlere kadar bu konuda bilgi sahibi olan bir çok  hukukçunun da görüşlerine kadar yer almasını sağladı. Kitap kısa sürede bu konuyla ilgilenenler tarafından yoğun ilgiyle karşılaştı. Büyük bir boşluğu doldurdu. Kitap bir çok Yargıtay üyesine , medya mensubuna , TBMM üyelerine , bakanlıklara kadar gönderildi.

 

7- Yerel yönetimler , üye derneklerimizin katkıları ile Anamur , Düzce , Diyarbakır , Istanbul gibi bir çok ilde HAYTAP ‘ın yerel yönetimlerle yapmış olduğu görüşmelerle ile bu bilboardları asıldı. Bunun yanında , gerek tanıtım gerekse yerel yönetimleri hayvan hakları konusuna daha duyarlı olmaya ikna edebilmek ve onlarla işbirliği içinde çalışabilmek için broşür ve afiş basılması için çalışmalara başlandı

 

8- İdari makamlara sayısız dilekçeler yollandı , belediye başkanları başta olmak üzere birçok görüşme sağlandı. Özellikle Ege Koordinatörimiz Funda Ersoy , Ege bölgesinde hemen hemen tüm sıkıntılı olan barınaklara girdiler , belediyeleri ikna yolu ve işbirliği yolunu göstererek bir çok başarılı çalışmaya imza attılar.

Belediye karşısında bizleri layıkıyla temsil edecek , egolarına yenilmemiş yepyeni ekiplerle alternatif çözümler sunuldu. Burhaniye , Fethiye , Ayvalık , Küçükköy, Altınova , Kuşadası gibi bir çok yerde kısa zamanda büyük işler başarıldı

 

9- Usta film yönetmeni Halit Refiğ ile işbirliği yapılarak , kendisinin yıllar önce çekmiş olduğu KÖPEKLER ADASI filmi Beyoğlu sinemasında HAYTAP ın girişimi ve sanatçı camiasının da katılımıyla sunuldu. Film tekrar gündeme getirildi. HAYTAP tarafından usta yönetmene şilt verildi.

 

10- Antalya’da düzenlenen Akdeniz Çevre Platformu’na (AKÇEP)’e , HAYTAP konuşmacı olarak davet edildi ve Türkiye’deki hayvan hakları sorunu , çözümleri , yasal değişiklik nedenleri , mevcut durum somut önerilerle tekrar masaya yatırıldı. Farklı illerden gelen bir çok  katılımcının  olduğu bu toplantıda HAYTAP ın katetmiş olduğu başarı ve çalışmalar diğer katılımcı dernek ve platformlar tarafından takdir edildi. Akçep sonuç bildirgesi yayınlandığında da bu sene hayvan hakları ihlalleri ve yapılması gerekli çalışmalar da bu bildirinin içine koyuldu.


11- Federasyon evinin kurulması ile yeni katılımcılara HAYTAP EVİ CUMARTESİ TOPLANTILARI adı altında bilgilendirmeye yönelik toplantılara başlandı. Yeni katılımcılara tasarım grubundan , petshoplara , hayvanat bahçesinden deney grubuna kadar yeni görev dağılımları oluşturulmaya başlandı.Hizmet içi eğitim çalışmalarına başlandı. Yeni gelen katılmak isteyen kişilerle yeni ekipler kurulma girişimleri başladı ve bu çalışmalar halen devam etmekte. Hayvan haklarının kedi köpeğin başını sevmekten çok daha geniş kapsamlı bir hareket olduğu , gönüllü çalışmalarının internet yerine daha çok sinerjinin oluştuğu birebir görüşmeler , ekip çalışması ve eğitim ile olduğu vurgulanmaya devam etti. Bir çok yeni arkadaş kazandık , bir çoğu ile eskisinden daha verimli ürünler çıkmaya başladı.

 

12-    HAYTAP ‘ın , Istanbul barosu hayvan hakları komisyonu ve İstanbul Veteriner hekimler odası ile beraber uzun yıllardır üzerinde çalıştığı , bir çok dernek ve kişinin de görüşüne başvurarak hazırladığı yasa teklifi uzun çabalar sonucu AKP ve CHP li milletvekilleri tarafından meclise sunuldu , kanunlar ve kararlar dairesinden geçti ve ilgili komisyonlarda görüşmeler yapıldı. Bunun öncesi ve sonrasında meclis ile birebir görüşmelerden , kitapların dağıtımına , yazışmalara kadar bir çok arkadaşımız seferber oldu. Milliyet , Radikal ve Fanatik gazetelerinde yasa değişikliği ile ilgili büyük ilanlarımız çıktı

 

13-    Büyükçekmece göl havzasına Istanbul Büyükşehir belediyesi tarafından moloz dökümü nedeniyle göl havzasının kurumasına neden olacak ve bu nedenle oradaki binlerce yabani hayvanın ve göçmen kuşun ölümüne neden olabilecek hatalı bir idari işlemin iptali için  idare mahkemesine federasyonumuz tarafından yürütmenin durdurulması istemli iptal davası açıldı. Dava ise halen devam etmekte.

 


14-
  Ağustos ayında Zeytinburnu belediyenin işletmiş olduğu Zeytinburnu barınağına içeriye gönüllülerin alınmaması , hayvanların durumunun barınakta bulunmaya elverişli olmaması nedeniyle Bakırköy 7 sulh hukuk mahkemesi tarafından tespit yaptırıldı. Alınan bilirkişi raporu bu barınağın barınak özelliklerine haiz olmadığını ve kapatılması gerektiğini vurguladı . Bunun üzerine belediye temsilcilmierimize 10 milyarlık manevi tazminat davası açtı. ( davalar halen devam ediyor )

 
15- Kurban bayramı sırasında gönüllülerimizin çoğu , ulaşabildikleri barınaklara gidip yardımcı olmaya çalışırken bunlardan en dramatik olanı Istanbul Güngören'deki belediye barınağının sahipsiz ve acınası hali idi. Görüntülerin ve yazışmaların CNN Turk televizyonuna aktarılması ile yaklaşık 5 gün boyunca bu barınak üzerine televizyonda yayınlar ve röportajlar yapıldı , arkadaşlarımız yaşadıkları durumu tüm Türkiye'nin gözü önüne sererek büyük bir çalışmaya imza attılar.


16-
Yılın en önemli çalışmalarından birisi halen gösterimde olan Istanbul’daki sokak hayvanları sorununa bir belgesel bakış açısıyla değinen İZ TV kanalı ile yapmış olduğumuz çalışma idi. Bu televizyon belgeseli 2010 yılına kadar sürekli olarak televizyonlarımızın Digiturk 88.kanalında dönmeye devam edecek. Tüm görüntülerin ve konuşmaların bütün çıplaklığı ile yansıtıldığı bu belgesel , doğru insanlarla çalışıldığı , doğru insanlarla röportaj yapıldığı zaman aslında ne kadar önemli ürünlerin de ortaya çıktığını
ortaya koyan başarılı bir yapım oldu.


17- Bunun yanında yıl içinde Haytap ekibi olarak defalarca gazetelere , televizyonlara , internet haber sitelerine hayvan hakları hareketinin kurumsallaşması , örgütlü ve hukuki bir yapı içinde devam etmesi için sayısız haber çıkarken , başta Newsweek dergisi olmak üzere bir çok kitle iletişim aracında hukuki  görüşlerimiz yayınlandı , afişlerimiz çıktı , üye derneklerimizin konser ve stand organizasyonları başta olmak üzere bir çok çalışması oldu.

Son Güncelleme ( Pazar, 17 Ocak 2010 23:10 )


Warning: imagejpeg() [function.imagejpeg]: Unable to open '/home/haytap/public_html/images/resized/images/stories/galeriler/yasam_hayvanlar/anne_olmak_5_400_264.jpg' for writing: Permission denied in /home/haytap/public_html/modules/mod_janews/helper.php on line 127

CONFISCATE ! (*)

CONFISCATE  !  (*)


My conscience is more to me than what the world says

CICERO







 

I have been thinking about this notion for a very long time, longer than you can guess!

However I can not figure out the moral side of it. I can only understand the disgrace, impudence, unfairness of human kind only when I look from their point of view, and then I feel shame to see this harsh world.

What kind of a world do we live in ? And the victims, our friends, they do not even mention it. They can’t tell (explain) as they are speechless though they have feelings. There is a speechless army consisting of millions of animals over the way, but all with feelings and sensation.

What we have done up to now is truly usurpation  !

There are no buts about it. It is neither theft, nor fraud or insult.





It is truly Confiscate   and unfair !

How come we feel that we have the right to set the babies apart from a poor dog or a cat without permission and sell or give them away to be owned by human kind ?  Try to take a 3 months old little baby from the mothers arms…

What could she tell you ?

Well, why do people eat veal meat and do not prefer cow meat ?

Or why do they insist on eating lamb meat ?

Please pay attention that either lamb or veal is still immature. They are worldly innocence. However, when they grow old and become cows and sheep, their meat become tough and they are not preferred by the customer (!) anymore.

In brief, a newborn mammal is always preferred to an old mammal, just as how human being prefer young and tender. What a wicked and cheap system is this ?

Mammals, especially cows have a 9 months and 10 days pregnancy period exactly as human do. It  is not an easy job to carry a living thing in your tummy for a year. Later on someone comes up and takes the little veal apart from the mother, shortly wrests. However, that little veal still belongs to her mother during nursing period. Poor mother can’t even object her little baby being stolen from her. She can’t fight back.

She can’t even utter a peep.

Try taking the little lamb away from the sheep… How she will bleat! How she feels sorrow! She can’t do anything except for popping off bleaking around. That sheep you despise is able to find her baby in the crowded herd. However, human kind is able to set the baby apart from his mother without mercy.

How unfair! He is just a little lamb, only 3 months old!

I suppose elephants have a pregnancy period of two years. I watched a couple of days ago, they separated the mother elephant from the infant in order to force her make the move they wanted.  They set them apart violently by force only because the mother did not make the moves they wanted. How cruel ! How shameful ! Why all this ? Only for the elephant to stand up and jump into the hoop and the children to applaud. They tied poor mother on the legs and besides put the newborn infant far from her, where she couldn’t reach but she could see.

This is truly unfair  ! There are no buts about it.


Criminal for theft is softer than the criminal for usurpation under the law of Turkish Penal Code, as compared to theft, wrest includes violence and force. Wrest includes subjection of the victim by force. Sadly, as the laws are mostly human kind based, only cat&dog lovers.



It is exactly the same thing as how you feel when someone comes up and snatches your bag violently and you shout at his back and cry for help and then swear behind him helplessly wishing for his execution.. There is no difference. The only difference is that our eyes are closed for incidents of this unusual world and that we do not want to open them.

Theft is more honourable compared to this impudence.



As human kind, we have an enormous  body, gigantic sticks, chains and various ways of captivity to use against them. Those are the reasons why they fear us, not only the fear of knife but also the fear that we cause them by seizing their property by force.


And suddenly we seize ‘a life’ which is not meant to be ours.

What kind of business is it to produce and sell puppies under the name of finding puppies a home ? What law gives us the right to set the baby apart from the mother ?



I am sure of one thing that all mammals feel the same as human do. Just like a toothache, stomachache or earache (pain in the ear). Who can say that they do not have mother feelings ? Are they considered as mothers only when they are nursing ?

The only difference between us is as you know they can’t say, express.. They can’t tell.  And stil some of us insist on lamb sauté
 

A dolphin should somersault in order to have the right to see her baby. For God’s sake! This is her right. How come you own her family as if they are your invoiced property only because she gave a birth under your responsibility ? How come you cram monkeys, bears into zoos tearing them apart from their homeland ? How come you ruin this innocence ? Is it their excuse to be born as ‘the others’ ?

No man, I do not agree to this system !

This system of the world is already accepted, however I strictly rise against it. What we try to tell might be understood in 500 hundred years from now, but the fact is that our behaviour to our mammal friends is totally unfair and disagreeable.

 We can’t change the fact of possession in our minds and accept that they have their rights as well. It’s likely that we prefer defencing their owners’ rights rather than their rights.

 
What if they threaten our lives violently and set us apart from our family as how we do to them ? See then how we put them in great distress. But, when it comes to us, don’t we repeat the same behaviour every day ?

 

Don’t we seize the poor ones and their property according to our rules by killing their babies right in front of them, making them cry, causing psychological crisis and giving them pain ?

Don’t we confiscate the mercy in their unknown world ?


Ahmet Kemal Şenpolat

Attorney- At- Law
President of Animal Rights Federation HAYTAP in Turkey




Bu metni Türkçe okumak istiyorsanız lütfen tıklayın.





 

 

 

Son Güncelleme ( Çarşamba, 11 Kasım 2009 13:56 )


Warning: imagejpeg() [function.imagejpeg]: Unable to open '/home/haytap/public_html/images/resized/images/stories/pictogramlar/dunyavehayvanlar_450_306.jpg' for writing: No such file or directory in /home/haytap/public_html/modules/mod_janews/helper.php on line 127

There is no Nationalism in Defending Animal Rights!

There is no Nationalism in Defending Animal Rights!



The biggest union in which the notions of language, religion, race and nationality are not taken into account and in which everybody allies for one combat is the union of animal rights defenders.

Our animal rights defender friends who are combating consciously for this matter are without prejudice towards each other. They all have one and only goal; is to obey the rules declared within the Universal Declaration of Animal Rights, adopted by the United Nations and also warn those who do not comply with it. Since "existing" and to "breath" is already a legal right.

Animals are not assets, goods but they are living creatures.

In other words, a German who combats to defend animal rights is more important for us than a Turk who abuses animals. Or a Brazilian peasant who defends the animal rights is more eligible to us than a Turkish mayor who keeps poisoning the animals.

Since the animal rights defenders are united for a unique goal, which is to prevent the animals being abused or tortured by people and to defend their right to live with us in this world. Because this world belongs to all of us. That’s why a lot of animal rights defenders, no matter what nationality he is, are against zoos, circuses, furs, pet shops which have turned into animal abuse centers and they’re also against governments which do not include these to their programs. We fight hand in hand for this and we never insult people for their nationality or their religion.


However, those who do not love animals or those who don’t want to understand us, mostly tend to mold public opinion implying “they shall save their own animals first, and then they can help us”, in order to create disconnection and contradiction among us.

For instance , if a Spanish animal lover helps an animal in our country, it’s very absurd to say that he must save the bulls in his own country first before helping other countries. Or when a Canadian animal lover rises against the skinning out of dogs to be furs in China, it is ridiculous to say that he must  protect the seals of his own country first before giving hand to other countries.

In an animal rights struggle, the Canadian, the Chinese, the Turk, the English, the Italian do not have these prejudices. If it’s necessary, he will set his heart to this struggle for correcting also his own county’s system with his international friends and associations and create pressure on their own governments' and administrative authorities'.



It is true that where there are people , there will  always be animal abuse and torture.

However , there are no country borders for the animals. People shall not be accused for the wrong politics adopted by their states. Just like that we, the animal rights defenders shall not be accused for our municipalities who poison our animals every summer or lock them into small rooms called “shelters”. Also, the fact that we cooperate with the rest of the world to warn these municipalities doesn’t mean that we are against our nation or that we don’t love our country. A Canadian animal lover does feel bad as we do when the seals are being killed, a Japanese animal lover does feel depressed as a Turkish animal lover would do when dolphins are being slaughtered or being sold to external markets to be a circus animal.


It is wrong to attach this struggle to any nation, race, religion or language. In this combat to innovate the legislations of our countries, we take support from and give support to these international friends, without prejudice. Nobody looks to the other one’s religion, language or nation while saving the elephants in Africa or while escaping the bears from the slaughter camps in China or while opening secretly the cages of minks caught for their fur. The joy is in different languages, but the tears are all in the same language.


In fact , the real fight  is done  against the egocentric undeveloped wild human who considers animals as enemies, who wants to keep seeing them as a “commodity”.


The biggest union in the world will be established then.

Ahmet Kemal SENPOLAT
Attorney at Law
President of Animal Rights Federation HAYTAP  in Turkey


ahmetsenpolat@haytap.org
Bu yazıyı Türkçe olarak okumak istiyorsanız lütfen tıklayın

Son Güncelleme ( Perşembe, 30 Temmuz 2009 15:51 )

Sayfa 1 > 9